Podcast Reference Material Episodes 1-10
Podcast 10: Why all the questions about 911?
All information embedded into Podcast
4/13- Genetically Modified Foods, Don’t Eat Your Veggies?
Genetically Modified Food Background
Salvation Revelation Posts About Contaminated Wheat Gluten
Biofueled Cars to Raise Price of Meats
3/27- Bloodlines of the Bible, Fallen Angels, Giants, and UFOs
Geneology Adam to Jesus Reference
(Mt 24:24, Mk 13:22), Jesus followed it by emphasizing, “So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time.” There is the implication that sound, anointed teaching is what guards the believer from deception, not some supernatural immunity. The church has always had to zealously guard against doctrinal deception. Much of Paul’s writing is dedicated to refuting false doctrines that were creeping into the early church, and leading many astray. Relevant to this age, we are specifically told in 1 Timothy 4 “… that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.”
Sitchin’s Test Tube Baby Glyph
Sitchin claims to have found this symbol on a Sumerian glyph
Sitchin claims this diagram is a copy of what he found on a Sumerian glyph, It “reveals” the “double helix” from above. Note, this “DNA” is represented by serpents, not space men.
Was the Egyptian Royalty of a demonic bloodline?
What do you think Queen Nefertiti was hiding under there?
Buzz Aldrin on UFO Sighting During Apollo 11
Chuck Missler on UFOs.
This is more of what I was talking about… MUCH MUCH more. Chuck is a Christian and has some amazing photos, video, and quotes to back this strong “alien” delusion theory up.
If you are curious about where the Nephilim or Giants went after the Old Testament, I suggest checking out Steve Quayle’s website. I consider Steve to be the most well read and well researched of Christian authors that talk about the Nephilim. There are some amazing pictures on this site. The wealth of information, including that of Egyptian treasures uncovered in the Grand Canyon in the early 1900s is stunning.
The Raelians “Space People” For Human Cloning
3/7- Pagan Origins: Christmas, Easter, the Cross, and the Fish
“Ishtar“, which is pronounced “Easter” was a day that commemorated the resurrection of one of their gods that they called “Tammuz”, who was believed to be the only begotten son of the moon-goddess and the sun-god.
Easter: There’s a tradition that colored eggs originated in the dyeing of eggs with the blood of newly sacrificed children, whose lives were given in the hope of a plentiful harvest. I can’t think of anything more repulsive to God.
Christmas: Thus the pagan Semiramis (Egyptian Isis) and Tammuz (Horus) were “transformed,” by sleight of hand, by the “magicians” of the Roman Church, into Mary and Yeshua. In this manner, the pagan practices of the past centuries became outwardly “Christian” in name and character! For almost 300 years after the time of Yeshua, the Church showed no concern for the date of the Messiah’s birth. The apostles and leaders of the New Testament Church never bothered to find out when Yeshua was born, as the date was not important to them. It was not until the fourth century that Christmas began to be observed by the Roman Catholic Church
Alexander Hislop in The Two Babylons, “The Christmas tree, now so common among us, was equally common in Pagan Rome and Pagan Egypt. In Egypt that tree was the palm tree; in Rome it was the fir; the palm tree denoting the Pagan Messiah, as Baal-Tamar, the fir referring to him as Baal-Berith. The mother of Adonis, the Sun-God and great mediatorial divinity, was mystically said to have been changed into a tree, and when in that state to have brought forth her divine son. If the mother was a tree, the son must have been recognized as the ‘Man the branch.’ And this entirely accounts for the putting of the Yule Log into the fire on Christmas Eve, and the appearance of the Christmas tree the next morning” (page 97).
YEHOVAH God commanded ancient Israel, “I am the Lord your God. You must NOT DO AS THEY DO IN EGYPT, where you used to live, and you must NOT DO AS THEY DO IN THE LAND OF CANAAN, where I am bringing you. DO NOT FOLLOW THEIR PRACTICES. You must obey my laws, and be careful to follow my decrees” (Lev.18:2-4).
YEHOVAH God hates idolatry! He detests it with vehement passion. He tells us, “. . . Be careful not to be ensnared by inquiring about their gods, saying, ‘How do these nations serve their gods? We will do the same.’ YOU must NOT WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD IN THEIR WAY, because in worshiping their gods, they do all kinds of DETESTABLE THINGS the LORD HATES” (Deut.12:29-31).
Jeremiah 10: Hear ye the word which the LORD speaketh unto you, O house of Israel: 2Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. 3For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. 4They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.
The Cross: According to the book Babylon Mystery Religion, the cross originated among the ancient Babylonians of Chaldea. From there, it spread to ancient China, India, Mexico, parts of Africa and other places, centuries before Christianity was born.
3/15 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Osama Bin Laden, and WWIII
Original post about Khalid Sheihk Mohammed
Original post about Warning Osama to Hide
Osama takes Credit For 911 just before 2004 election and after Mohammed was already in custody
I took these pictures and information from this site. Please read it for more nuances about the first post 911 “Bin Laden” tape.
The picture of Jalalabad can be found on that page or directly by clicking here.
3/7 Occult Symbols or American Patriotism
I won’t retype everything, but here are links to all of the posts
with ALL of the information and pictures.
Capital Building or Satanic Tomb
Baal’s Shaft or George Washington’s… Monument?
Lincoln Log Cabin or Apollo’s Temple?
2/21/07- Podcast #4 Iraqi Refugees and Under Reported Muslim Terrorism
Iraqi Refugees
US officials also announced Wednesday that the country would accept about 7,000 Iraqi refugees over the next seven months — a 10-fold increase in the number of Iraqi asylum seekers Washington has taken in since its 2003 invasion of the country
Under Reported Terrorism
The father of Trolley Square shooter Sulejmen Talovic apologizes over and over for the ordeal. Suljo Talovic says no one who knew his son saw this coming, and he believes someone pushed him to do it.
Suljo Talovic doesn’t know where his son got the guns or how he learned how to use them.
Suljo Talovic, Father of Shooter: “Somebody got (the guns)…and maybe (they were) training him and tell(ing) him (to), ‘go shoot somebody.’”
Question: So you think that somebody influenced him maybe to do this?
Suljo Talovic: “Yeah. I think somebody.”
Utah killer’s father was in Bosnian Muslim army
Sulejman Talovic, an 18-year-old immigrant fatally shot by police after Monday’s rampage, was only 4 when he and his mother fled their village of Talovici on foot after Serbian forces overran it in 1993, people close to the family told The Associated Press.
“Sulejman and his mother walked to Srebrenica, and from there were later evacuated by a U.N. convoy,” he said.
“Suljo, the father, headed over the mountains and forests with his comrades as well. Many left the village, but only a few made it.”
Many mujahedeen from Muslim states came in Bosnia to fight in 1992-95 war and committed monstruous atrocities againsy Serb civilians.
A bearded 21-year-old student, Joel Hinrichs, who blew himself up with a backpack filled with TATP (the explosive of choice in the Mideast) outside a packed Oklahoma University football stadium not long after he started attending the local mosque
After apparently undergoing a religious awakening, a Saudi Arabian student in Houston killed his Jewish friend by slashing his throat.
Mohammed Ali Alayed, 23, pleaded guilty to the Aug. 6 attack on Ariel Sellouk, also 23, who almost was decapitated with a knife, the Houston Chronicle reported.
After apparently undergoing a religious awakening, a Saudi Arabian student in Houston killed his Jewish friend by slashing his throat.
Mohammed Ali Alayed, 23, pleaded guilty to the Aug. 6 attack on Ariel Sellouk, also 23, who almost was decapitated with a knife, the Houston Chronicle reported.
The D.C. snipers — John Muhammad and Lee Malvo, both black Muslim converts — who picked off 13 people in the suburbs around the Beltway as part of what Muhammad described as a “prolonged terror campaign against America” around the first anniversary of 9/11, which he had
praised.
Omeed Aziz Popal of Fremont, Calif., who police said hit and killed a bicyclist there then took his SUV on a hit-and-run spree in San Francisco, mowing down pedestrians at crosswalks and on sidewalks before police caught up with him, whereupon the Muslim called himself a “terrorist.”
Omeed Aziz Popal is a Muslim native of Afghanistan. He is alleged to have intentionally struck 19 pedestrians with his black Honda Pilot SUV on August 30, 2006, and faces a murder charge and 18 counts of attempted murder.[1][2] Popal was 29 at the time of the attack. Several major news organizations have described his attack in the San Francisco Bay Area as a “rampage.”
The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Popal “was terrorizing the neighborhoods near the Western Addition and Pacific Heights,” and KTVU reported that a woman at the scene of the arrest heard Popal say “I’m a terrorist, I don’t care.” A second witness confirmed the first’s account.
Popal’s rampage ended in front of the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco, where the final two victims were struck.
However, within hours of Popal’s arrest, police asserted that there was no evidence of Popal’s intent to commit an act of terrorism.
On July 28, 2006, a Muslim named Naveed Afzal Haq forced his way into the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle. Once inside, Haq announced, “I’m a Muslim American; I’m angry at Israel,” and then began shooting, killing one woman and injuring five more. FBI assistant special agent David Gomez stated: “We believe … it’s a lone individual acting out his antagonism. There’s nothing to indicate that it’s terrorism-related. But we’re monitoring the entire situation.”
In March 2006, a 22-year-old Iranian student named Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove an SUV onto the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, deliberately trying to kill people and succeeding in injuring nine. During his arraignment, he explained that he was “thankful for the opportunity to spread the will of Allah.”
Officials dismissed the possibility of terrorism, even after Taheri-azar wrote a series of letters to the UNC campus newspaper detailing the Islamic justification for warfare against unbelievers and explaining why he believed his attacks were justified from an Islamic perspective.
The FBI and the media assured the public in every case that there was no connection between Islam and the attacks.
2/2/07- Podcast #3 Is Prince Charles the Antichrist?
I forgot to mention this book in the podcast. It seems to be the thesis behind a good deal of the people that are expecting Charles to rise up and become the Antichrist. I haven’t read it myself, but from the reviews on Amazon I definitely will have to check it out. I’m also adding a free video feed on here to the author of the book. It’s not the highest quality and Tim is a little “dry” but he really goes into detail with some good visuals and loads of great explanation.
My original post on the subject with the short video clip.
COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE DOG, LION, & UNICORN
Prince Charles’ coat of arms and crest was designed for him by the British College of Heraldry, using a system of guidelines over 500 years old. It contains ALL the Biblical symbols of the Antichrist. It has a dog supported by a roaring lion and a unicorn, (called a wild beast with a straight horn, a wild oxen, or ‘little horn’). Psalms 22:19-21 describes these animals, with a prayer for deliverance… “Ps 22:19 But be not thou far from me, O LORD: O my strength, haste thee to help me. 20 Deliver my foul from the sword; my darling from the power of the dog. 21 Save me from the lion’s mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns. “
HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE BEAST
Revelations 13:2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion:
and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. The composite beast of Revelation 13:2, with the head of a lion, body of a leopard and feet of a bear is symbolic for other people–but not for Prince Charles. It is on his Coat of Arms. It represents the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire. These are the animal symbols for France, the leopard; Germany, the Bear; and England, the lion. These nations represented the western arm of the Holy Roman Empire. His Coat of Arms contains ten heraldic beasts, which is a first for the British Monarchy. All previous British Monarchs had either three or six, but none have ever had ten.
#4c - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE RED DRAGON
Revelations 13:2 also says, “And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority.” The dragon is “symbolic” to others, but not to Prince Charles. He has a red dragon on his coat of arms. It comes from the flag of Wales, and it is in this title, Prince of Wales, that Charles is heir-apparent to the throne of Great Britain. At his coronation (investiture as Prince of Wales) in 1969, he sat on a chair with a large red dragon emblazoned on it. During the ceremony, his mother Queen Elizabeth II said, “This dragon gives you your power, your throne and your own authority.” His response to her was, “I am now your Liege-man, and worthy of your earthly worship.” Liege is an old English word meaning “Lord”. “I am now your Lord-man, and worthy of your earthly worship.” Another reference to the red dragon is in Revelations 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. Prince Charles is the ONLY person in the world to whom “And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority” can literally be applied to!
#4d - HIS COAT OF ARMS / CREST - THE ORDER OF THE GARTER
Another symbol on Prince Charles’ Coat of Arms is that of The Order of the Garter. The Order of the Garter is the parent organization over Free Masonry, worldwide. When a man becomes a 33rd Degree Mason, he swears allegiance to that organization, and thereby to Prince Charles. According to “The ‘Morals and Dogma’ of the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Freemasonry” written by Albert Pike (Grand Commander, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, July 14, 1889) Lucifer is the GOD of Freemasonry (see page 321 of the 1942 edition). On page 819 you will find just one example of why there are many people in Freemasonry who believe that it is natural to be a Christian and a Mason. Masonry intentionally misleads the low degree initiates and hides the truth that the god of Freemasonry is Lucifer, except to those in the 30th and higher degrees. “The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are on display there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them.” Further proof of Lucifer worshipping amongst Freemason can be seen in how they measure the year. For instance the year 1998 (up until September) is according to freemasonry the year 5997 AL (that is 5997 anno Lucifer).
THE MARK OF THE BEAST
Revelation 13:16 “And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads.” On March 6th, 1996 on CNN, Prince Charles showed the world that he and his two sons William and Harry, had been the first people to be voluntarily implanted with a microchip (traceable biochip) in their right hands, allegedly for security purposes.
HIS NAME
Revelations 13:18 “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six”. According to onomastics (the study of names) “Charles” literally means “man”, in fact the words “Charles” and “man” are interchangeable. So Revelations 13:18 could be interpreted as saying “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a CHARLES; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” The antichrist is also described in Daniel 9:26 as ‘the prince that shall come’. If Charles is the antichrist then the term ‘prince’ can be taken literally.
HIS NUMBER
According to Hebrew gematria his name adds up to 666 in both English and Hebrew (i.e., “Charles Prince of Whales” or “nasich Charles me Whales” - the values 1-9 are assigned to the first 9 letters of the alphabet, 10-90 for the next 9 letters, and 100-400 for the last four letters, (they only have 22 characters in the alphabet.) Using this system of math, and applying it to the first 22 characters of the English alphabet, (the last 4 letters equate to zero), we can calculate names in English just as you can calculate names in Hebrew.
note: I didn’t write this myself. I find all of this information on various websites, most of it comes directly from http://www.clydelewis.com/dis/prince/prince.html. Do a google search of Prince Charles and Antichrist. There are literally hundreds of pages of information about him.
Prince Charles Bloodline (Queen Elizabeth’s Side)
If you want to be able to read it clearly, you’ll need to view it at full size.
1/29/06- Podcast #2 Habeus Corpus
Military”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006″>Military Commissions Act
The Act has also been denounced by critics who assert that its wording makes possible the permanent detention and torture (as defined by the Geneva Conventions) of anyone - including American citizens - based solely on the decision of the President.[17] Indeed, the wording of section 948b[18] of the act appears to explicitly contradict the Third Geneva Convention of which the United States is currently a signatory.
According to Bill Goodman, Legal Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Joanne Mariner, from FindLaw, this bill redefines unlawful enemy combatant in such a broad way that it refers to any person who is engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States.
Alberto”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales”>Alberto Gonzales
As Governor Bush’s counsel in Texas, Gonzales also reviewed all clemency requests. A 2003 article in The Atlantic Monthly asserts that Gonzales gave insufficient counsel, failed to take into consideration a wide array of factors, and actively worked against clemency in a number of borderline cases. (The state of Texas executed more prisoners during Gonzales’ term, and still has more prisoners on death row, than any other state.)
Much controversy surrounded Gonzales’ January 2005 Senate Confirmation Hearings. At one point during the hearings, Senator Russ Feingold, in attempting to determine where Gonzales believed the president’s authority ends, asked whether the president could act in contravention of existing criminal laws and spy on U.S. citizens without a warrant. Gonzales did not directly answer the question, claiming that warrantless eavesdropping was a “hypothetical situation” and thus impossible to answer. He went on to add that it was “not the policy or the agenda of this president” to authorize actions that conflict with existing law. These statements were later proven false, when on February 6, 2006, he testified before Congress to his knowledge of the U.S. domestic spying program while he was White House Counsel.
In public statements Gonzales has advocated the use of torture, such as the methods used at Abu Ghraib, and he sees the use of torture justified since the world has entered a “new paradigm”. (New World Order)Gonzales also sees The Geneva Conventions treaties that set the standard for international law for humanitarian concerns, and deal with human rights and war crimes issues, as “obsolete”.
Podcast #1 CIA and Bush Family Links to Nazi Germany
1/26/06- Podcast#1 Albert Pike’s 3 World Wars & The North American Union
http://threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm” title=”albert pike”>Albert Pike Info
http://threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm” title=”Third World War”>Albert Pike and the Three World Wars:
“The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the “agentur” (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.” 2
Students of history will recognize that the political alliances of England on one side and Germany on the other, forged between 1871 and 1898 by Otto von Bismarck, co-conspirator of Albert Pike, were instrumental in bringing about the First World War.
“The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.” 3
After this Second World War, Communism was made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, a large portion of Europe was simply handed over to Russia, and on the other side of the world, the aftermath of the war with Japan helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China.
(Readers who argue that the terms Nazism and Zionism were not known in 1871 should remember that the Illuminati invented both these movements. In addition, Communism as an ideology, and as a coined phrase, originates in France during the Revolution. In 1785, Restif coined the phrase four years before revolution broke out. Restif and Babeuf, in turn, were influenced by Rousseau - as was the most famous conspirator of them all, Adam Weishaupt.)
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.” 4
North American Union Official Site
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50973” title=”plan to rule the world”>Plan to Rule the World
http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml” title=”gonzolez”>Gonzolez Questions Habeus Corpus:
Responding to questions from Sen. Arlen Specter at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Jan. 18, Gonzales argued that the Constitution doesn’t explicitly bestow habeas corpus rights; it merely says when the so-called Great Writ can be suspended.“There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there’s a prohibition against taking it away,” Gonzales said.
Gonzales’s remark left Specter, the committee’s ranking Republican, stammering.
“Wait a minute,” Specter interjected. “The Constitution says you can’t take it away except in case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus unless there’s a rebellion or invasion?”
Gonzales continued, “The Constitution doesn’t say every individual in the United States or citizen is hereby granted or assured the right of habeas corpus. It doesn’t say that. It simply says the right shall not be suspended” except in cases of rebellion or invasion.”
“You may be treading on your interdiction of violating common sense,” Specter said.
While Gonzales’s statement has a measure of quibbling precision to it, his logic is troubling because it would suggest that many other fundamental rights that Americans hold dear also don’t exist because the Constitution often spells out those rights in the negative.
For instance, the First Amendment declares that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Applying Gonzales’s reasoning, one could argue that the First Amendment doesn’t explicitly say Americans have the right to worship as they choose, speak as they wish or assemble peacefully.
Applying Gonzales’s reasoning, one could argue that the First Amendment doesn’t explicitly say Americans have the right to worship as they choose, speak as they wish or assemble peacefully. The amendment simply bars the government, i.e. Congress, from passing laws that would impinge on these rights.Similarly, Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution states that “the privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
The clear meaning of the clause, as interpreted for more than two centuries, is that the Founders recognized the long-established English law principle of habeas corpus, which guarantees people the right of due process, such as formal charges and a fair trial.
That Attorney General Gonzales would express such an extraordinary opinion, doubting the constitutional protection of habeas corpus, suggests either a sophomoric mind or an unwillingness to respect this well-established right, one that the Founders considered so important that they embedded it in the original text of the Constitution.
Other cherished rights – including freedom of religion and speech – were added later in the first 10 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights.
Ironically, Gonzales may be wrong in another way about the lack of specificity in the Constitution’s granting of habeas corpus rights. Many of the legal features attributed to habeas corpus are delineated in a positive way in the Sixth Amendment, which reads:
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed … and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; [and] to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses.”
Imprisoned”>http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53918″>Imprisoned agent’s wife: President is a hypocrite
Leave a Reply