America Online Asks, “Who Should Not Be Saved in a Pandemic?”
America Online has constructed an article and poll, the likes of which are disgustingly inhumane, asking “Who Should Not Be Saved in a Pandemic?” Telling is the fact that the question doesn’t ask “Who should be saved first…” but rather implies and outright tells us that in the event of a pandemic, many will be refused treatment, simply for being “old” or “weak”.
The specter of terrorism and the boogie man of impending doom always looming close by is eating away at America like a cancer, devouring our morality. We are no longer playing with a deck of cards containing “right” and “wrong”. They’ve been replaced with “acceptable” and “for the greater good”.
As you will see, flu pandemic is mentioned in this death inducing scenario, but is quickly followed up with “other disaster” which is very clearly vague enough to raise some eyebrows. Is is a flood, a drought, a terrorist attack? Which is enough “disaster” to allow the government to begin culling the population?
The America Online article begins very clearly,
“Doctors know some patients needing lifesaving care won’t get it in a flu pandemic or other disaster. The gut-wrenching dilemma will be deciding who to let die.”
Who to “let die” and/or who to force death upon by refusing treatment are actually being sold to the public as a new concept, merged into meaning the same thing.
“Now, an influential group of physicians has drafted a grimly specific list of recommendations for which patients wouldn’t be treated. They include the very elderly, seriously hurt trauma victims, severely burned patients and those with severe dementia.
The suggested list was compiled by a task force whose members come from prestigious universities, medical groups, the military and government agencies. They include the Department of Homeland Security, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services.”
In other words, the government along side of “prestigious” doctors is now selecting which citizens should be spared in the event of a pandemic event. While the idea is being sold to America as necessary and Americans will have a chance to take part in the online poll, clearly average Americans can’t be trusted to take part in this type of decision making. As usual, it is the ruling elite that is rolling the dice of our lives.
I certainly hope the prestigious Professor Eric R. Pianka isn’t part of the planning “party”.
“Professor Pianka used the occasion to champion the notion, apparently without sanction of the Academy, that the Earth can only be saved if ninety percent of the human beings alive today are purged form the planet. He championed airborne Ebola as the most efficient virus to accomplish this. And while he stopped short of calling for terrorist action to bring this result about, he clearly implied that this was a right and proper future for our species and our planet. Astonishingly, after advocating for a future in which more than 5,000,000,000 persons would die a slow and agonizing death, many members of the Texas Academy of Science stood to their feet and applauded.”
“The proposed guidelines are designed to be a blueprint for hospitals “so that everybody will be thinking in the same way” when pandemic flu or another widespread health care disaster hits, said Dr. Asha Devereaux. She is a critical care specialist in San Diego and lead writer of the task force report.
The idea is to try to make sure that scarce resources - including ventilators, medicine and doctors and nurses - are used in a uniform, objective way, task force members said.
Their recommendations appear in a report appearing Monday in the May edition of Chest, the medical journal of the American College of Chest Physicians.
“If a mass casualty critical care event were to occur tomorrow, many people with clinical conditions that are survivable under usual health care system conditions may have to forgo life-sustaining interventions owing to deficiencies in supply or staffing,” the report states.
To prepare, hospitals should designate a triage team with the Godlike task of deciding who will and who won’t get lifesaving care, the task force wrote. Those out of luck are the people at high risk of death and a slim chance of long-term survival. But the recommendations get much more specific, and include:
- – People older than 85.
- – Those with severe trauma, which could include critical injuries from car crashes and shootings.
- – Severely burned patients older than 60.
- – Those with severe mental impairment, which could include advanced Alzheimer’s disease.
- – Those with a severe chronic disease, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease or poorly controlled diabetes.
Dr. Kevin Yeskey, director of the preparedness and emergency operations office at the Department of Health and Human Services, was on the task force. He said the report would be among many the agency reviews as part of preparedness efforts.
As if the New World Order’s cold shadow of death is slowly falling upon the land, with more and more Americans accepting their programing, a psyop of mass destruction so to speak… the idea of rationalizing who can and should die in an emergency situation is becoming more and more acceptable to America.
Lets look at Hurricane Katrina as one eye opening event that brought euthanasia to the mainstream news.
“…Their attorneys have said they acted heroically, staying to treat patients rather than evacuate.
“This was not euthanasia,” Foti said at a news conference last summer. “This was homicide.”
Foti accused the three of involvement in as many as nine deaths at the hospital.
The investigation concluded that patients were given a “lethal cocktail” of morphine and midazolam hydrochloride, both central nervous system depressants, he said.
None of the patients had been prescribed the drugs by their caregivers, and none of the accused treated them before the injections, Foti said.
Yet, a grand jury cleared the doctor at the center of the controversy of all charges.
Next we can look at Pope John Paul II.
“The debate over the Vatican’s opposition to euthanasia is being played out here over an especially public and delicate case: the death of Pope John Paul II.
Over the past week, the Vatican and an Italian doctor have sparred over the doctor’s accusation that John Paul should have been fitted earlier with a feeding tube. The doctor, Lina Pavanelli, an anesthesiologist, argued in a magazine article, then again this week in public, that the failure to do so before March 30, 2005, when the Vatican announced that John Paul had been fitted with a nasal feeding tube, deprived him of necessary care and thus violated church teachings on euthanasia. He died, at 84, on April 2 that year.
In an article in the magazine, Micromega, Dr. Pavanelli argued, “When the patient knowingly refuses a life-saving therapy, his action together with the remissive or omissive behavior of doctors, must be considered euthanasia, or more precisely, assisted suicide.”
So while most people don’t see the connection, not initially anyway I believe it becomes clearer as we learn more about the New World Order and groups behind it’s creation that have called for population reduction. Many of these “Darwinian” occultists have subscribed to the same theosophical teachings that Adolf Hitler used to justify the extermination of the Jews, a handful of other ethnic groups, and of course… the feeble, weak, and/or sick.
It is after all “survival of the fittest’ that fuels leaps in evolution. So, for those that prescribe to such a religion, they certainly look to justify the killing that they are indeed planning to implement sometime in the near future as… part of the culling of the weak for the sake of the “spiritual” evolution of mankind.
Recently the world watched as Ted Turner began running his mouth off about the New World Order plan to kill off a large sum of the Earth’s population.
“We’re too many people; that’s why we have global warming,” he said. “Too many people are using too much stuff,” adding that “on a voluntary basis, everybody in the world’s got to pledge to themselves that one or two children is it.”
Statements like this are nothing new to Turner. As far back as 1996 he was making statements such as,
“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
We can go back even farther to Prince Phillip of England who is quoted by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988,
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
There is so much more to read on the topic of population control and population reduction that I cannot possibly address it all here.
As Christians, it’s your decision. You can deny that this is going on because you believe that evil doesn’t exist or that your government could never be infiltrated by evil, or you can choose to read the Word of God that verifies all of this in simple terms that ANYONE can and should be able to understand.
Revelation 6:8 states,
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.”
The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse will be allowed to kill 1/4 of the Earth’s population. The Earth has well over 6 billion people. So in theory you’re looking at well over 1 billion deaths from just this one chapter of the Book of Revelation.
This article also appeared in my local paper, and, I assume, in papers across the country. It was, of course, a preemptive manipulation of the public. The seed has been planted, and when the stories break that many must be turned away from hospitals across the nation, the senarios presented in this article will no doubt be referred to. The fact that the article is appearing in Chest is telling. It will be doctors who have a background in respirtory diseases that will be dealing with the effects of the Bird Flu.
this totally imoral and disgusting. that means my son who is mentally hadicapped will not get treatment or my husband he has diabetes which the doctors are trying very hard to control. is there anything we as citizens can do to change this?